May 17, 2012
e.g., "Rule number eight: exploit superstitious thinking"
"Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" ("... written for reviewers who may not have sufficient statistical expertise to provide an informed critique during the peer-reviewed process, but would like to recommend rejection on the basis of inappropriate or invalid statistical analysis") by Prof. Karl Friston will appear in the journal NeuroImage.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
ShareThis
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(121)
-
▼
May
(14)
- Proofreading is important, part 3.
- A proof of the existence of an intelligent proofre...
- Привет, Россия!
- A first kiss.
- Title of the Week!
- Adam Gopnik on Stories & Science
- The sun & the moon (heard on my morning commute...)
- Best. Coffee. Ever.
- Spring Flower-Blogging!
- Seeing Is Believing.
- On going wide (& tall) without schlepping.
- "Finally, SUPEREGO-related neural activity was loc...
- e.g., "Rule number eight: exploit superstitious th...
- "h" vs. "H" (and the Mountain Goats, Down Under)
-
▼
May
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment