Good science is more like Proust than Mr. Popper’s Penguins; its stories startle us with their strangeness, but they intrigue us by their originality, and end by rewarding us with the truth, after an effort. It is the shock good stories offer to our expectations, not some sop they offer to our pieties, that makes tales tally, and makes comtes count. The story that tells us only that we like all kinds of stories lacks that excitement, that exclusionary power, which is the only thing that makes us want to hear stories at all.
May 23, 2012
Adam Gopnik on Stories & Science
- ► 2014 (44)
- ► 2013 (87)
- Proofreading is important, part 3.
- A proof of the existence of an intelligent proofre...
- Привет, Россия!
- A first kiss.
- Title of the Week!
- Adam Gopnik on Stories & Science
- The sun & the moon (heard on my morning commute......
- Best. Coffee. Ever.
- Spring Flower-Blogging!
- Seeing Is Believing.
- On going wide (& tall) without schlepping.
- "Finally, SUPEREGO-related neural activity was loc...
- e.g., "Rule number eight: exploit superstitious th...
- "h" vs. "H" (and the Mountain Goats, Down Under)
- ▼ May (14)
- ► 2011 (227)
- ► 2010 (369)